Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

requirements:skills list #599

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

requirements:skills list #599

merged 7 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

JarbasAl
Copy link
Member

@JarbasAl JarbasAl commented Nov 15, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new optional dependencies for enhanced functionality, including skill-wordnet, ovos-skill-days-in-history, ovos-skill-laugh, ovos-skill-number-facts, ovos-skill-iss-location, and ovos-skill-cmd.
    • Added a new category for optional skills in the setup configuration, allowing users to install additional features.
    • Updated the version constraint for ovos-skill-homescreen to ensure compatibility with newer versions.
    • Added ovos-skill-screenshot and ovos-skill-color-picker as new dependencies for GUI functionalities.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed obsolete dependencies from the essential skills list to streamline core functionality.
    • Updated installation command for a Python package in the workflow configuration.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies several dependency files and a GitHub Actions workflow for a Python project. The workflow file updates the installation command to include a new package list for optional skills. New dependencies are added to the requirements/skills-desktop.txt and requirements/skills-extra.txt files, while some dependencies are removed from requirements/skills-essential.txt. Additionally, new dependencies are introduced in requirements/skills-gui.txt, and a new extra requirement is added in setup.py.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/build_tests.yml Updated pip install command to change extras from skills-essential to skills-extra.
requirements/skills-desktop.txt Added new dependencies: ovos-skill-wallpapers>=1.0.2,<3.0.0 and ovos-skill-screenshot>=0.0.2,<1.0.0.
requirements/skills-essential.txt Removed dependencies: skill-wordnet>=0.0.10,<1.0.0 and #skill-randomness>=0.0.1,<1.0.0.
requirements/skills-extra.txt Added new dependencies: skill-wordnet, ovos-skill-days-in-history, ovos-skill-laugh, ovos-skill-number-facts, ovos-skill-iss-location, ovos-skill-cmd with respective version constraints.
requirements/skills-gui.txt Added new dependencies: ovos-skill-screenshot>=0.0.2,<1.0.0 and ovos-skill-color-picker>=0.0.2,<1.0.0.
setup.py Added extra requirement for skills-extra linked to requirements/skills-extra.txt.

Possibly related PRs

  • chore: release_tests #590: The changes in this PR directly modify the .github/workflows/build_tests.yml file, specifically updating the installation command for a Python package, which aligns with the changes made in the main PR regarding the installation command for skills-extra.

Suggested labels

fix

Suggested reviewers

  • j1nx
  • mikejgray
  • builderjer

Poem

In the meadow where skills grow,
New dependencies start to flow.
With extras added, oh what fun,
A brighter future has begun!
So hop along, let’s celebrate,
Our project’s changes are truly great! 🐇✨

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@JarbasAl has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 34 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c3abdf5 and 2515a08.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.13%. Comparing base (23f0bab) to head (2515a08).
Report is 86 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #599      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.33%   73.13%   -2.21%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines        3094     1526    -1568     
==========================================
- Hits         2331     1116    -1215     
+ Misses        763      410     -353     
Flag Coverage Δ
end2end 56.48% <ø> (?)
unittests 49.34% <ø> (-26.00%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
requirements/skills-extra.txt (1)

1-1: Fix hyphenation in comment

The compound word "non essential" should be hyphenated as "non-essential".

-# skills providing non essential functionality
+# skills providing non-essential functionality
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[misspelling] ~1-~1: This expression is normally spelled as one or with a hyphen.
Context: # skills providing non essential functionality skill-wordnet>=0.0.6,<1.0...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_NON_ESSENTIAL)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 78c83cf and f8366df.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/build_tests.yml (1 hunks)
  • requirements/skills-essential.txt (0 hunks)
  • requirements/skills-extra.txt (1 hunks)
  • setup.py (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • requirements/skills-essential.txt
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
requirements/skills-extra.txt

[misspelling] ~1-~1: This expression is normally spelled as one or with a hyphen.
Context: # skills providing non essential functionality skill-wordnet>=0.0.6,<1.0...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_NON_ESSENTIAL)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/build_tests.yml (2)

43-43: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider removing redundant skills package installation

The installation command includes both skills-essential and skills-extra. Since skills-extra typically includes or depends on skills-essential, this might be redundant and could potentially lead to dependency conflicts.

Consider simplifying to:

-pip install .[mycroft,lgpl,plugins,skills-essential,skills-extra,skills-audio,skills-gui,skills-internet,skills-media,skills-desktop]
+pip install .[mycroft,lgpl,plugins,skills-extra,skills-audio,skills-gui,skills-internet,skills-media,skills-desktop]

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


43-43: Verify Python version compatibility for moved skills

Since the workflow tests against Python 3.7-3.11, we should verify that the skills moved between skills-essential and skills-extra are compatible with this Python version range.

✅ Verification successful

Let me check the actual package dependencies and Python compatibility information from the repository itself.


Let me check the specific skill packages that were moved between skills-essential and skills-extra in this PR.


Let me check the content of the skills-extra.txt file to see the specific requirements for these skills.


Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:

Skills moved to skills-extra are compatible with Python 3.7-3.11

The moved skills (skill-wordnet, ovos-skill-randomness, and ovos-skill-days-in-history) don't specify any Python version restrictions in their package metadata. They follow the same dependency structure as other OVOS skills, which are known to work with Python 3.7-3.11. The movement of these skills from skills-essential to skills-extra is purely organizational and doesn't affect their Python compatibility.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Python version compatibility metadata for the moved skills

# Check setup.py and requirements files for the moved skills
echo "Checking for skill-wordnet package..."
curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/skill-wordnet/json | jq '.info.requires_python'

echo "Checking for ovos-skill-randomness package..."
curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/ovos-skill-randomness/json | jq '.info.requires_python'

echo "Checking for ovos-skill-days-in-history package..."
curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/ovos-skill-days-in-history/json | jq '.info.requires_python'

Length of output: 566


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for setup.py files and Python version requirements in the skills
echo "Searching for setup.py files containing Python version requirements..."
rg -l "python_requires" | grep -i "setup.py"

echo -e "\nChecking Python version related content in setup.py files..."
fd "setup.py" --exec cat {} \; | grep -A 5 -B 5 "python\|Python"

echo -e "\nChecking requirements.txt files..."
fd "requirements.txt" --exec cat {} \;

Length of output: 5461


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the changes in setup.py to identify moved skills
echo "Checking setup.py for skills package changes..."
git diff origin/dev -- setup.py | grep -A 5 -B 5 "skills-essential\|skills-extra"

# Also check any skill-specific setup files
echo -e "\nChecking for specific skill setup files..."
fd -e py -e txt . -E "node_modules" -E "build" -E "dist" --exec grep -l "wordnet\|randomness\|days-in-history" {}

Length of output: 974


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the requirements files for the moved skills
echo "Checking skills-extra.txt..."
cat requirements/skills-extra.txt

echo -e "\nChecking skills-essential.txt..."
cat requirements/skills-essential.txt

echo -e "\nChecking git diff for these files..."
git diff origin/dev -- requirements/skills-extra.txt requirements/skills-essential.txt

Length of output: 1634

setup.py (2)

82-82: LGTM! The addition of 'skills-extra' follows the established pattern.

The new entry is properly integrated into the extras_require dictionary and follows the same structure as other skills-related requirements.


82-82: Verify the requirements file exists and contains the expected dependencies.

Let's ensure the referenced requirements file exists and contains the mentioned dependencies (skill-wordnet, ovos-skill-randomness, ovos-skill-days-in-history).

✅ Verification successful

Requirements file exists and contains all expected dependencies

The requirements/skills-extra.txt file exists and contains all the expected dependencies with proper version constraints:

  • skill-wordnet (>=0.0.6,<1.0.0)
  • ovos-skill-randomness (>=0.1.0,<1.0.0)
  • ovos-skill-days-in-history (>=0.1.0,<1.0.0)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and content of skills-extra.txt

# Check if the file exists
if [ -f "requirements/skills-extra.txt" ]; then
    echo "File exists. Contents:"
    cat "requirements/skills-extra.txt"
else
    echo "Warning: requirements/skills-extra.txt not found"
fi

# Verify specific dependencies are present
echo -e "\nChecking for specific dependencies:"
for dep in "skill-wordnet" "ovos-skill-randomness" "ovos-skill-days-in-history"; do
    if [ -f "requirements/skills-extra.txt" ]; then
        if grep -q "$dep" "requirements/skills-extra.txt"; then
            echo "$dep found"
        else
            echo "$dep not found"
        fi
    fi
done

Length of output: 1130

requirements/skills-extra.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
requirements/skills-extra.txt (1)

1-1: Fix hyphenation in header comment

The term "non essential" should be hyphenated for correct English usage.

-# skills providing non essential functionality
+# skills providing non-essential functionality
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[misspelling] ~1-~1: This expression is normally spelled as one or with a hyphen.
Context: # skills providing non essential functionality skill-wordnet>=0.0.6,<1.0...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_NON_ESSENTIAL)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f8366df and 0a391d1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • requirements/skills-extra.txt (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
requirements/skills-extra.txt

[misspelling] ~1-~1: This expression is normally spelled as one or with a hyphen.
Context: # skills providing non essential functionality skill-wordnet>=0.0.6,<1.0...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_NON_ESSENTIAL)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
requirements/skills-extra.txt (1)

2-5: LGTM! Dependencies are well-structured

The dependency declarations look good:

  • All version constraints properly specify both minimum and maximum versions
  • Version ranges are appropriate for pre-1.0 packages
  • The commented out ovos-skill-randomness indicates it's being considered but not yet included

Let's verify the latest versions of these packages:

✅ Verification successful

Dependencies verified - all packages available at specified versions

The verification confirms that all packages are available on PyPI with versions matching the constraints:

  • skill-wordnet: 0.0.6 (matches >=0.0.6,<1.0.0)
  • ovos-skill-days-in-history: 0.3.6 (matches >=0.3.6,<1.0.0)
  • ovos-skill-laugh: 0.1.1 (matches >=0.1.1,<1.0.0)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify current versions against PyPI
# Expected: All packages should be available with versions matching constraints

for pkg in "skill-wordnet" "ovos-skill-days-in-history" "ovos-skill-laugh"; do
  echo "Checking $pkg..."
  curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/$pkg/json" | jq -r '
    if .info.version then
      "Latest version: " + .info.version
    else
      "Package not found"
    end
  '
done

Length of output: 1052

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
requirements/skills-extra.txt (1)

1-1: Fix compound word in header comment

The term "non essential" should be hyphenated as "non-essential" for correct English compound word formation.

-# skills providing non essential functionality
+# skills providing non-essential functionality
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[misspelling] ~1-~1: This expression is normally spelled as one or with a hyphen.
Context: # skills providing non essential functionality skill-wordnet>=0.0.6,<1.0...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_NON_ESSENTIAL)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0a391d1 and df81dae.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • requirements/skills-extra.txt (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
requirements/skills-extra.txt

[misspelling] ~1-~1: This expression is normally spelled as one or with a hyphen.
Context: # skills providing non essential functionality skill-wordnet>=0.0.6,<1.0...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_NON_ESSENTIAL)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
requirements/skills-extra.txt (2)

2-7: LGTM: Package versions and constraints

The version constraints for all packages follow a consistent pattern (>=current,<1.0.0) appropriate for pre-1.0 packages. The version updates suggested in the previous review have been applied correctly.


2-7: Verify the commented skill inclusion decision

The ovos-skill-randomness package is commented out, suggesting uncertainty about its inclusion. Please clarify if this package should be included or removed entirely.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try another search strategy to verify this package's usage.


The ovos-skill-randomness package was intentionally commented out

Based on the git history, this package was recently commented out deliberately, and there are no active references to it in the codebase. The package appears in the "non essential functionality" section of skills, and its removal seems to be an intentional decision to make it optional rather than a required dependency.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if ovos-skill-randomness is used or referenced elsewhere in the codebase

echo "Checking for references to ovos-skill-randomness..."
rg -l "ovos-skill-randomness" --type py

echo "Checking if the skill is imported or used in Python files..."
ast-grep --pattern 'import $_ from "ovos-skill-randomness"'
ast-grep --pattern 'from "ovos-skill-randomness" import $_'

Length of output: 407


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any references to randomness skill in requirements files and potential configuration
echo "Checking all requirements files..."
fd requirements.txt --exec cat {}
fd "skills.*\.txt" --exec cat {}

echo -e "\nChecking for any configuration files that might reference this skill..."
fd "config" --extension yaml --extension json --exec grep -l "randomness" {} \;

echo -e "\nChecking git history for any recent changes related to this skill..."
git log -p --all | grep -i "randomness"

Length of output: 2798

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/build_tests.yml (1)

43-43: Consider optimizing the installation process.

The current installation command includes many extras which could impact build time and stability. Consider:

  1. Breaking down the installation into smaller steps for better error handling
  2. Using requirements.txt files directly for testing specific skill categories

Here's a suggested approach:

-pip install .[mycroft,lgpl,plugins,skills-essential,skills-extra,skills-audio,skills-gui,skills-internet,skills-media,skills-desktop]
+# Install core dependencies first
+pip install .[mycroft,lgpl,plugins]
+# Install skill dependencies
+pip install -r requirements/skills-essential.txt
+pip install -r requirements/skills-extra.txt
+pip install -r requirements/skills-audio.txt
+pip install -r requirements/skills-gui.txt
+pip install -r requirements/skills-internet.txt
+pip install -r requirements/skills-media.txt
+pip install -r requirements/skills-desktop.txt

This approach:

  • Provides clearer error messages if a specific category fails
  • Makes it easier to debug dependency conflicts
  • Allows for selective testing of specific skill categories
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 78c83cf and 5d2b137.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • .github/workflows/build_tests.yml (1 hunks)
  • requirements/skills-desktop.txt (1 hunks)
  • requirements/skills-essential.txt (0 hunks)
  • requirements/skills-extra.txt (1 hunks)
  • requirements/skills-gui.txt (1 hunks)
  • setup.py (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • requirements/skills-essential.txt
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • requirements/skills-gui.txt
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
requirements/skills-extra.txt

[misspelling] ~1-~1: This expression is normally spelled as one or with a hyphen.
Context: # skills providing non essential functionality skill-wordnet>=0.0.6,<1.0...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_NON_ESSENTIAL)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
requirements/skills-desktop.txt (2)

3-3: LGTM! Version constraints follow best practices.

The version constraints (>=1.0.2,<3.0.0) are well-defined, allowing for minor updates while preventing breaking changes from major versions.


3-3: Verify package availability and security status

Let's ensure the package exists and check for any security advisories.

✅ Verification successful

Package verified and secure for usage

The package ovos-skill-wallpapers is:

  • Available on PyPI with version 1.0.2
  • No security vulnerabilities found in GitHub's advisory database
  • Version constraint (>=1.0.2,<3.0.0) aligns with the latest available version
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify package existence and check for security advisories

# Check if package exists on PyPI
echo "Checking package existence on PyPI..."
curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/ovos-skill-wallpapers/json" | jq -r '.info.version'

# Check for security advisories
echo "Checking for security advisories..."
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: PIP, package: "ovos-skill-wallpapers") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 607

.github/workflows/build_tests.yml (1)

43-43: Verify the necessity of including both skills-essential and skills-extra.

Since dependencies were moved from skills-essential to skills-extra, including both extras might be redundant. Please verify if both are still needed.

Let's check the contents of both requirements files:

✅ Verification successful

Both skills-essential and skills-extra contain distinct packages without overlap

The requirements files show:

  • skills-essential.txt contains core offline functionality skills (e.g., fallback, alerts, personal, date-time)
  • skills-extra.txt contains non-essential skills (e.g., wordnet, days-in-history, laugh, number-facts)

There is no redundancy between the two extras, so including both in the pip install command is correct and necessary.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare the contents of skills-essential and skills-extra requirements
# to identify any potential overlap or redundancy

echo "=== skills-essential.txt ==="
cat requirements/skills-essential.txt 2>/dev/null || echo "File not found"

echo -e "\n=== skills-extra.txt ==="
cat requirements/skills-extra.txt 2>/dev/null || echo "File not found"

Length of output: 758

setup.py (1)

82-82: LGTM! Addition follows existing patterns.

The new skills-extra entry is properly integrated into the extras_require dictionary and follows the established pattern of other skills-related extras.

Let's verify the existence and content of the referenced requirements file:

✅ Verification successful

Verified: skills-extra.txt exists with valid package requirements

The referenced file exists and contains a well-formatted list of optional skill packages with proper version constraints. The file's content aligns with its intended purpose of providing non-essential functionality, as indicated by the comment.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and content of skills-extra.txt

# Check if the file exists
if [ -f "requirements/skills-extra.txt" ]; then
    echo "File exists. Contents:"
    cat "requirements/skills-extra.txt"
else
    echo "Warning: requirements/skills-extra.txt not found"
fi

Length of output: 422

setup.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
requirements/skills-gui.txt (1)

2-3: Consider stability implications of pre-1.0 dependencies

Both new dependencies are pre-1.0 versions which typically indicate unstable APIs:

  • ovos-skill-screenshot (>=0.0.2)
  • ovos-skill-local-media (>=0.2.1)

Consider:

  1. Documenting any known API instabilities
  2. Setting up automated tests to catch breaking changes
  3. Planning for potential API changes in future releases
requirements/skills-desktop.txt (1)

3-3: Consider narrowing the version range for ovos-skill-wallpapers

The current version constraint >=1.0.2,<3.0.0 allows for both v1.x and v2.x versions, which could introduce compatibility issues since major version changes typically include breaking changes.

Consider constraining to a single major version:

-ovos-skill-wallpapers>=1.0.2,<3.0.0
+ovos-skill-wallpapers>=1.0.2,<2.0.0
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5d2b137 and 0961566.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • requirements/skills-desktop.txt (1 hunks)
  • requirements/skills-gui.txt (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
requirements/skills-gui.txt (2)

1-3: Verify cross-dependency compatibility

Please ensure these skills can coexist without conflicts, especially since they all interact with the GUI system.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can make a determination about the GUI-related skills compatibility. Let me generate the final response:

The GUI skills appear to be compatible and properly integrated

The codebase shows these skills are designed to work together within OVOS's GUI framework:

  • ovos-skill-homescreen is the main homescreen manager that provides the base GUI interface
  • ovos-skill-screenshot integrates with the display system for taking screenshots
  • ovos-skill-local-media works with the GUI for media playback and display

The skills use standardized GUI message bus events and interfaces, with no conflicting resource usage found. The GUI framework provides proper skill management and display coordination through:

  • Dedicated GUI service and websocket handling
  • Display manager for coordinating GUI access
  • Homescreen manager for skill integration
  • Standardized GUI interfaces for skills
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for potential conflicts in GUI-related configurations
# and shared resource usage

# Search for common GUI-related settings
rg -A 5 "display|screen|window|gui" 

# Check for any documented conflicts or requirements
fd "README|CHANGELOG" | xargs rg -i "requirement|conflict|depend"

Length of output: 169888


1-1: Verify compatibility with ovos-skill-homescreen v3.x

The major version bump (3.x) suggests breaking changes. Please ensure that dependent packages are compatible with this version.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now make a determination about the compatibility concerns with ovos-skill-homescreen v3.x. The search shows:

  1. The homescreen skill is primarily used for GUI functionality and display management
  2. The core system has proper GUI integration and display management capabilities
  3. The version bump appears to be a planned upgrade as evidenced by the CHANGELOG.md entry

Let me verify if there are any breaking changes or compatibility issues by checking the commit history.


Based on the git history, I can now make a determination about the homescreen version bump. The changes show a clear progression:

  1. Initial introduction at unversioned state
  2. Added versioning >=0.0.3,<1.0.0
  3. Moved to stable v1 >=1.0.2,<2.0.0
  4. Gradually increased to >=1.0.4,<3.0.0
  5. Finally updated to >=3.0.1,<4.0.0

The commit messages indicate these were planned version bumps to "allow latest homescreen version" with no mentions of breaking changes or compatibility issues.

The version bump appears to be a normal progression following semantic versioning

The core integration with the homescreen skill is primarily through the GUI system which handles version compatibility through the messagebus interface. The codebase shows proper GUI integration with appropriate event handling for homescreen functionality.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any imports or references to ovos-skill-homescreen
# to verify compatibility with v3.x

# Look for imports and usage patterns
rg -l "from ovos_skill_homescreen|import ovos_skill_homescreen"

# Look for potential configuration files that might need updates
fd -e yaml -e json -e conf | xargs rg "homescreen|home_screen"

Length of output: 169888


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check recent changes to requirements file
git log -p requirements/skills-gui.txt

# Look for any recent PRs or issues mentioning homescreen compatibility
gh pr list --search "homescreen"
gh issue list --search "homescreen"

Length of output: 6774

requirements/skills-desktop.txt (2)

1-4: Verify desktop environment compatibility

Since these skills require a Linux desktop environment, we should verify they handle desktop environment detection properly to avoid issues on non-desktop systems.

Let's check for desktop environment detection code:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for desktop environment detection in the packages
echo "Checking desktop environment detection patterns..."
rg -l "XDG|DISPLAY|WAYLAND|desktop|x11" 

# Look for environment-specific error handling
echo "Checking error handling for missing desktop..."
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
  $$$
} catch ($_) {
  $$$
  "desktop"
  $$$
}'
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~2-~2: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...skill-application-launcher>=0.5.4,<1.0.0 ovos-skill-wallpapers>=1.0.2,<3.0.0 ovos...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)


4-4: Verify stability of ovos-skill-screenshot package

The package version (0.x.x) indicates it's in early development and may not be stable. While the narrow version range helps, pre-1.0 versions might still introduce breaking changes.

Let's verify the package status and recent updates:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the package's stability by checking its repository history and activity.


Package appears stable despite early version number

The package shows healthy development patterns:

  • Active maintenance with recent updates (last commit on Nov 18, 2024)
  • No open issues reported
  • Consistent version releases (6 releases including alpha versions)
  • Version constraint (>=0.0.2,<1.0.0) is appropriately restrictive

While it's a pre-1.0 version, the package demonstrates stability through its structured release process and active maintenance. The version constraints will protect against potential breaking changes.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check package info and release history
curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/ovos-skill-screenshot/json | jq '{
  "latest_version": .info.version,
  "release_date": .releases[.info.version][0].upload_time,
  "author": .info.author,
  "project_urls": .info.project_urls
}'

# Check for any reported issues
if [[ $(curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/ovos-skill-screenshot/json | jq -r '.info.project_urls.Source // empty') =~ github.com ]]; then
  REPO=$(curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/ovos-skill-screenshot/json | jq -r '.info.project_urls.Source' | sed 's/.*github.com\///')
  gh api repos/$REPO/issues --jq '.[].title'
fi

Length of output: 550


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract repo details from homepage URL since Source URL is not available
REPO=$(curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/ovos-skill-screenshot/json | jq -r '.info.project_urls.Homepage' | sed 's/.*github.com\///')

# Check repository activity
if [ ! -z "$REPO" ]; then
  echo "=== Commit History ==="
  gh api repos/$REPO/commits --jq 'length as $total | .[0:5] | map({date: .commit.committer.date, message: .commit.message}) | {"total_commits": $total, "recent_commits": .}'

  echo -e "\n=== Issues ==="
  gh api repos/$REPO/issues --jq 'length as $total | . | map({title: .title, state: .state}) | {"total_issues": $total, "issues": .}'

  echo -e "\n=== Release History ==="
  gh api repos/$REPO/releases --jq 'length as $total | . | map({tag_name: .tag_name, published_at: .published_at}) | {"total_releases": $total, "releases": .}'
fi

Length of output: 1784

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
requirements/skills-extra.txt (1)

1-1: Fix spelling in header comment

The term "non essential" should be hyphenated as "non-essential" for correct English grammar.

-# skills providing non essential functionality
+# skills providing non-essential functionality
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[misspelling] ~1-~1: This expression is normally spelled as one or with a hyphen.
Context: # skills providing non essential functionality skill-wordnet>=0.0.10,<1....

(EN_COMPOUNDS_NON_ESSENTIAL)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c3abdf5 and 2515a08.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • .github/workflows/build_tests.yml (1 hunks)
  • requirements/skills-desktop.txt (1 hunks)
  • requirements/skills-essential.txt (0 hunks)
  • requirements/skills-extra.txt (1 hunks)
  • requirements/skills-gui.txt (1 hunks)
  • setup.py (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • requirements/skills-essential.txt
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • .github/workflows/build_tests.yml
  • requirements/skills-desktop.txt
  • requirements/skills-gui.txt
  • setup.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
requirements/skills-extra.txt

[misspelling] ~1-~1: This expression is normally spelled as one or with a hyphen.
Context: # skills providing non essential functionality skill-wordnet>=0.0.10,<1....

(EN_COMPOUNDS_NON_ESSENTIAL)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
requirements/skills-extra.txt (2)

2-8: LGTM! Version constraints look appropriate

The version constraints follow good practices:

  • All use appropriate ranges with upper bounds
  • Pre-1.0 packages are correctly constrained with <1.0.0
  • Version numbers appear to be current

3-3: Verify status of commented skill

The ovos-skill-randomness package is commented out. Please clarify if this is intentional or if it should be included.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more context about this skill's usage and dependencies.


Commenting out ovos-skill-randomness is intentional

The git history shows this was deliberately commented out on Nov 15, 2024 (commit 3e97a20) in the same commit that introduced several other skills. Since this file is explicitly labeled for "non essential functionality" and there are no other references to this skill in the codebase, this appears to be an intentional decision to make this skill optional.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if ovos-skill-randomness is used/imported elsewhere in the codebase
# Expected: Find references to understand if commenting out breaks existing functionality

echo "Checking for imports or references to ovos-skill-randomness..."
rg -l "ovos-skill-randomness"

echo -e "\nChecking PyPI for latest version info..."
curl -s "https://pypi.org/pypi/ovos-skill-randomness/json" | jq -r '
  if .info.version then
    "Latest version: " + .info.version + "\n" +
    "Release date: " + .releases[.info.version][0].upload_time + "\n" +
    "Home page: " + (.info.home_page // "N/A")
  else
    "Package not found"
  end
'

Length of output: 710


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check git history for this file to understand when/why it was commented out
git log -p requirements/skills-extra.txt

# Check if there are any other skill requirements files
fd requirements.txt

# Look for any configuration files that might reference this skill
rg -l "skill.ovos.randomness" 

Length of output: 4315

@JarbasAl JarbasAl merged commit d45e01b into dev Nov 19, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@JarbasAl JarbasAl deleted the fix/reqs branch November 19, 2024 22:42
This was referenced Nov 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant